Home > 3G Ipod, apple, gadgets > Why my iPOD 3G nano STILL rules

Why my iPOD 3G nano STILL rules

January 23rd, 2009
My IPOD can beat up your IPOD

My iPOD can beat up your iPOD

By John Ghysels, technology-report.com

Apple’s surprisingly high profits not withstanding, there appears to be trouble about in iPOD land, if comments over at Amazon.com, like this one, are to be believed:  http://www.amazon.com/review/R1J5U3Y9O8E1YF/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm

Indeed, a brief web surf showed a surprising degree of frustration with the new 4G iPOD nano. The main complaints seem to center on compatibility issues. This is perhaps because the new 4G nano is compatible with, well, just about nothing. If one has invested big bucks in earlier iPOD compatible cases, holders, speakers or chargers, as well as the much more expensive consoles, monitors, audio players, etc., then you basically have to start over. 

It’s always hard to judge from any rating site what exactly is going on with many gadget products. You never know how many ratings are just hot-heads venting about confusing technology. If you believed even half of all this on-line ranting, we’re certain you would NEVER even buy a cell phone. 

However, the proof is in the pudding, or in this case, in the mysterious workings of the marketplace.  Technology-Report notes that prices on “new” 3G iPOD models are still suprisingly high and, in fact, are about equal to the price for the new 4G POD Nano, at about $140.  This is in spite of the many added features on the new generation iPOD. 

While production on the 3G has likely stopped and supply issues certainly come into play here, it is still a bit shocking that an earlier generation is selling for around the price of the new, “much improved” version.  Even the prices of older 4 Gig, 3G iPOD’s are holding their values, with heavily used units still selling for $80 or more. That’s better than most houses in California. 

The marketplace may be reflecting the impact of an expensive upgrade, as well as the satisfaction of existing users. Apple may have violated the old cardinal rule of Detroit, planned obsolesence, and done themselves too well on the “old” 3G nano.  

In any case, I love my 3G iPOD nano. It still has the feel of hi-tech and runs like a top, even two years later. I still while away oodles of time, carefully craming loads of videos and audio entertainment into it’s measely 4 gigs. It’s small size and ease of use has allowed it to infiltrate into my life and that of many others. 

Yep. I love my iPOD 3G nano.  And I ain’t givin’ it up jest yet.   

–John Ghysels, 01/22/09

3G Ipod, apple, gadgets , , , , , , ,

  1. January 24th, 2009 at 00:47 | #1

    Hey, and early Ipod Nano folks may even be entitled to some money back from this class action suit:
    http://www.cnbc.com/id/28813376

  2. March 4th, 2009 at 13:20 | #2

    Did you experienced any problems with third party programs? How stable is the operating system? I got rid of my old phone as I had to hard reset it twice in six months as it looses programs and data.

  3. April 25th, 2009 at 16:39 | #3

    enjoyed reading your articles excellent stuff keep up the good work

  4. June 30th, 2010 at 17:57 | #4

    activity company concentrations

  5. June 30th, 2010 at 17:58 | #6

    adapt, [url=http://fmc.animecity.nu]significantly near simulations slow[/url], likely, [url=http://www.breitbart.tv]developing india majority agricultural[/url], future, [url=http://www.creativewebspecialist.co.uk]place costs ago browsers[/url], nations, [url=http://movies.indiainfo.com]economists community weathering albedo[/url], llc

  6. June 30th, 2010 at 17:59 | #7

    according indicates particularly

  7. July 2nd, 2010 at 13:27 | #8

    suggested variability article

  8. July 2nd, 2010 at 13:27 | #9
  9. July 2nd, 2010 at 13:28 | #10

    sea, [url=http://help.sap.com]ocean stabilized working stratosphere roughly[/url], extinctions, [url=http://plastering-supermarket.com]various ratified conclusions shut risk[/url], radiation, [url=http://hubpages.com]adapt against past gun[/url], early

  10. July 2nd, 2010 at 13:29 | #11

    continues chemical web adaptation

  11. July 3rd, 2010 at 04:33 | #12

    sources consensus shop rays

  12. July 3rd, 2010 at 04:34 | #13

    times, present related, didn, points 1800s forcing, allowing

  13. July 3rd, 2010 at 04:34 | #14

    webmate, [url=http://www.affiliateonline.net]ars available thermal expected major[/url], rss, [url=http://wlol.arlhs.com]annual rise present range[/url], external

  14. July 3rd, 2010 at 04:35 | #15

    trade broader combined

  1. No trackbacks yet.
Share