<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TECHNOLOGY REPORT &#187; blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technology-report.com/category/blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technology-report.com</link>
	<description>Technology News, CES 2012 Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 23:04:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>TechCrunch&#8217;s Arrington banish-ed by AOL?</title>
		<link>http://technology-report.com/2011/09/techcrunchs-arrington-banish-ed-by-aol/</link>
		<comments>http://technology-report.com/2011/09/techcrunchs-arrington-banish-ed-by-aol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 18:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hunkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techcrunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology-report.com/?p=2239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the strangest posts in the tech blogosphere is yesterday&#8217;s rant at TechCrunch, suggesting that blog owner AOL may shake up things and remove TechCrunch founder Mike Arrington: techcrunch.com/2011/09/06/the-end/ TechCrunch has arguably been the most influential technology blog for some time, especially for startup news and inside information.   Spawned by Silicon Valley insider [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the strangest posts in the tech blogosphere is yesterday&#8217;s rant at TechCrunch, suggesting that blog owner AOL may shake up things and remove TechCrunch founder Mike Arrington:<br />
<a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/09/06/the-end/">techcrunch.com/2011/09/06/the-end/</a></p>
<p>TechCrunch has arguably been the most influential technology blog for some time, especially for startup news and inside information.   Spawned by Silicon Valley insider Mike Arrington, TechCrunch has been a key source of news, inside information, and gossip about the Silicon Valley Startup scene.</p>
<p>The AOL dispute appears to have come from concerns over potential conflicts of interest by Arrington as he launches a new venture capital fund that will support companies covered by TechCrunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technology-report.com/2011/09/techcrunchs-arrington-banish-ed-by-aol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domain Name Speculation</title>
		<link>http://technology-report.com/2010/09/domain-name-speculation/</link>
		<comments>http://technology-report.com/2010/09/domain-name-speculation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hunkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology-report.com/?p=2025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Data from Wikipedia&#8217;s entry on &#8220;Domain Name Speculation&#8221; * The number of registrations of .com domain names grew from 23,662,001  in  January 2003 to 80,759,835  in January 2009. Wiki goes on to note that a quirk in the registration rules led to a surge in the practice of &#8220;Domaintasting&#8221; where a huge bulk order of domain names [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data from Wikipedia&#8217;s entry on &#8220;<a title="Domain Name Speculation Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_name_speculation">Domain Name Speculation</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>* The number of registrations of .com domain names grew from 23,662,001  in  January 2003 to 80,759,835  in January 2009.</p>
<p>Wiki goes on to note that a quirk in the registration rules led to a surge in the practice of &#8220;<a title="Domain tasting" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_tasting">Domaintasting</a>&#8221; where a huge bulk order of domain names would be registered for a short time.   Only the names that created click revenue from pay per click ads would be kept.    This led to new domain hosting companies set up simply to filter for marginally valuable names that could be set up to get click revenue, and then to a new rule in June 2008 from ICANN, the body that oversees domain registrations.  ICANN started to limit the number of domains that a registrar could delete in the ICANN &#8220;grace period&#8221; where no fees were charged.   These grace period deletions fell by 99.7%<span style="font-size: small;"><span> the following year as the practice of &#8220;domain tasting&#8221; became less profitable. </span></span></p>
<p>Verisign Domain Brief in June 2009 identified  92 million <tt><a title=".com" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.com">COM</a></tt> and <tt><a title=".net" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.net">NET</a></tt> domain names, 24 percent with one page websites, 64% have multipage websites and 12% have no associated websites.</p>
<p>These last numbers suggest to me that the speculation is not as rampant as most seem to think &#8211; ie most sites are multiple page implying content and not speculation.    Of course systems like the one I&#8217;m testing now at Godaddy that auto-generate several pages of content make it even harder to distinguish between  sites that are driven speculatively vs those that are driven more by a passion to communicate or quality initiatives.       As the quality, sharable content online increases and systems become smarter I think we may see that it will be impossible to distinguish between sites created by humans and those made automatically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technology-report.com/2010/09/domain-name-speculation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter 140 Conference and WordCamp San Francisco</title>
		<link>http://technology-report.com/2009/05/twitter-140-conference-and-wordcamp-san-francisco/</link>
		<comments>http://technology-report.com/2009/05/twitter-140-conference-and-wordcamp-san-francisco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 19:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hunkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter 140]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordCamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mountain view]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordCamp San Francisco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology-report.com/?p=1230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technology Report will be live blogging the Twitter 140 Conference in Mountain View California and WordCamp San Francisco on Saturday May 30th. *The two day Twitter event starts Tuesday May 26th* This is only the second WordCamp San Francisco and promises excellent insider insights from WordPress founder Matt Mullenweg and Google&#8217;s top blogger Matt Cutts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technology Report will be live blogging the <a title="Twitter 140 Conference" href="http://parnassusgroup.com/twitterconference/">Twitter 140 Conference </a>in Mountain View California and <a title="SF WordCamp" href="http://2009.sf.wordcamp.org/">WordCamp San Francisco</a> on Saturday May 30th.</p>
<p>*The two day Twitter event starts Tuesday May 26th*</p>
<p>This is only the second WordCamp San Francisco and promises excellent insider insights from WordPress founder <a title="Matt Mullenweg" href="http://ma.tt/">Matt Mullenweg</a> and Google&#8217;s top blogger <a title="Matt Cutts" href="http://www.dullest.com/blog/">Matt Cutts </a>who has been using the WordPress blogging format for several years.</p>
<p>This is the first major Twitter conference *ever* and is sure to bring a lot of interesting people and companies to the Computer Science Museum in Mountain View.</p>
<p>Hope to see you there in person or here at Technology Report&#8217;s live coverage of these events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technology-report.com/2009/05/twitter-140-conference-and-wordcamp-san-francisco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogging CES &#8211; CES09 Blogroll</title>
		<link>http://technology-report.com/2009/01/blogging-ces-ces09-blogroll/</link>
		<comments>http://technology-report.com/2009/01/blogging-ces-ces09-blogroll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hunkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CES09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging ces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CES 2009]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology-report.com/?p=1048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blogging CES 2009: I&#8217;m reposting Lyn&#8217;s excellent blogroll from the official CES blog at blog.ce.org. For a complete pictures you&#8217;ll need to check a lot of blogs because even the companies like Engadget and Gizmodo, each I think with 10+ people reporting here, will feature only a small fraction of all the conference action here [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Blogging CES 2009:</h2>
<p>I&#8217;m reposting Lyn&#8217;s excellent blogroll from the <a title="blogging CES" href="http://blog.ce.org">official CES blog </a>at blog.ce.org.  For a complete pictures you&#8217;ll need to check a lot of blogs because even the companies like Engadget and Gizmodo, each I think with 10+ people reporting here, will feature only a small fraction of all the conference action here at CES, which is really almost too massive to imagine in terms of the number of exhibits across the two convention centers.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://ces.cnet.com/">CNET CES 2009</a></li>
<li><a title="Everything you wanted to know about IPv6" href="http://commandinformation.com/blog/">Command Information IPv6 Experts</a></li>
<li><a href="http://connectionsconference.blogspot.com/">CONNECTIONS</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.cedailynews.com/2008/12/cea-launches-30-days-of-innovation-countdown-to-ces-2009.html">Consumer Electronics Daily News</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.dealerscope.com/">Dealerscope</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/">Dot.life</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.e-gear.com/">E-gear</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.engadget.com/">Engadget</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.gadgetsblog.org/">Gadgets Blog</a></li>
<li><a href="http://garyvaynerchuk.com/">Gary Vaynerchuk</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.gibson.com/en-us/Lifestyle/Blogs/BERKLEE-MUSIC-BLOG/">Gibson Guitar Blog</a></li>
<li><a href="http://gigaom.com/">GigaOm</a></li>
<li><a href="http://ggadget.org/">Green Inc.</a></li>
<li><a href="http://growingupgadget.com/2008/07/07/toppling-tvs-and-toddlers/">Growingupgadget</a></li>
<li><a title="Home Automation Inc." href="http://blog.homeauto.com/default.asp">HAI Blog</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hitechgadget.net/">Hi Tech Gadget</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.idealgadget.com/">Ideal Gadget</a></li>
<li><a title="All the latest CES news, tweets, blogs, etc." href="http://www.consumerelectronicsinsider.com/">Intel’s Consumer Electronics Insider</a></li>
<li><a href="http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/gartenberg/">Michael Gartenberg</a></li>
<li><a href="http://natalidelconte.wordpress.com/natalis-blog/">Natali Del Conte</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.neatreceipts.com/blog/">Neat Receipts Blog</a></li>
<li><a href="http://parksassociates.blogspot.com/">Parks Associates Blog</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fasterforward/">Rob Pegoraro, Faster Forward, Washington Post</a></li>
<li><a href="http://scobleizer.com/">Scobleizer</a></li>
<li><a href="http://slashdot.org/">Slashdot</a></li>
<li><a href="http://news.sel.sony.com/electronicsblog/">Sony Electronics Blog</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blog.radiomagonline.com/talkback/">Talk Back from Radio Magazine</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.techeblog.com/">Techeblog</a></li>
<li><a href="../">Technology-Report.com</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.thegadgetblog.com/">The Gadget Blog</a></li>
<li><a href="http://pulverblog.pulver.com/">The Jeff Pulver Blog</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.thielaudio.com/weblog/index.html">Thiel Weblog</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.ubergizmo.com/">Ubergizmo</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.veronicabelmont.com/">Veronica Belmont</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technology-report.com/2009/01/blogging-ces-ces09-blogroll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Technology Stories of 2008</title>
		<link>http://technology-report.com/2008/12/top-technology-stories-of-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://technology-report.com/2008/12/top-technology-stories-of-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 07:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hunkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Tech Stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology-report.com/?p=980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update:  Don&#8217;t miss our upcoming CES 2011 live coverage here at Technology Report Techmeme is a favorite of many in technology for pulling together technology stories and the conversations that often swirl around them.  Unlike a simple &#8220;ranking&#8221; system, TechMeme surfaces the top stories and then links out to blogs and sites that are discussing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update:  Don&#8217;t miss our upcoming<a title="Technology Report" href="http://www.technology-report.com"> CES 2011 live coverage here at Technology Report</a></p>
<p><a title="TechMeme" href="http://www.techmeme.com">Techmeme</a> is a favorite of many in technology for pulling together technology stories and the conversations that often swirl around them.  Unlike a simple &#8220;ranking&#8221; system, TechMeme surfaces the top stories and then links out to blogs and sites that are discussing those &#8220;hot topics&#8221;.     Thus a quick review of TechMeme can give you a very fast orientation to the stories that are making their rounds in the blogs.    That does not always correspond to stories that actually *matter* to real folks, but it&#8217;s a great start.</p>
<p>TechMeme&#8217;s new story editor <a title="TechMeme top 2008" href="http://news.techmeme.com/081230/2008top10">Megan has a list here of the top 10 for 2008</a>.   Number one was the Microsoft &#8211; Yahoo aquisition saga, number two was Apple quitting MacWorld, and number three was Google Chrome.</p>
<p><em><br />
</em></p>
<p><em>Disclosure: Long on YHOO</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technology-report.com/2008/12/top-technology-stories-of-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CES 2008 &#8211; Blogging officially arrives at CES with some mixed reactions.</title>
		<link>http://technology-report.com/2008/01/ces-2008-blogging-officially-arrives-at-ces-with-some-mixed-reactions/</link>
		<comments>http://technology-report.com/2008/01/ces-2008-blogging-officially-arrives-at-ces-with-some-mixed-reactions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hunkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CES 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.com/2008/01/10/ces-2008-blogging-officially-arrives-at-ces-with-some-mixed-reactions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Blogger” is a new badge here at CES, given to about 200 people who registered as bloggers rather than press. However most of the bloggers here are under press badges and have been coming for some time. The early word &#8211; totally anecdotal and unofficial &#8211; from several CES and sponsor folks I had a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="snap_preview">
<p>“Blogger” is a new badge here at CES, given to about 200 people who registered as bloggers rather than press.   However most of the bloggers here are under press badges and have been coming for some time.     The early word &#8211; totally anecdotal and unofficial &#8211; from several CES and sponsor folks I had a chance to talk to include these observations:</p>
<p>* Bloggers are nicer than mainstream journalists.</p>
<p>* Bloggers more readily accept the giveaways, and thus are seen to be more subject to manipulation.</p>
<p>* Press people were upset that initially they could not get into the blog lounges but bloggers were allowed in Press areas.  This policy was quickly changed to allow press to blogger lounges, which were very comfortable.</p>
<p>* Gizmodos early <a title="Gizmodo CES" href="http://gizmodo.com/342495/ten-reasons-were-doomed-ces-edition">scathing critique</a> of CES is already being discussed at some length by CES insiders.    Hmmm &#8211; I’m noting they have toned down the coverage yet fessing up to some <a title="Gizmodo prankish crap" href="http://gizmodo.com/343348/confessions-the-meanest-thing-gizmodo-did-at-ces">prankish BS</a>.    Hmmm &#8211; can all bloggers and all suits mix happily?   No, all can’t but most can.</p>
<p>* Some big sponsors were complaining about the bloggers.</p>
<p>Donny Deutsch’s The Big Idea featured the Blog Bus and <a title="Robert Scoble" href="http://scobleizer.com">Robert Scoble</a>.   I have high regard for Robert’s blogging rules.  He’s highly credible but recognizes that you can’t eliminate all bias from the reporting.  Generally he just lays it out for folks to judge &#8211;  this is a good standard though I think we should develop a blogging *disclosure* policy where you can expect others to call you out if you pander to a sponsor without disclosing relationship.  I don’t like the idea of some complex “code of ethics” because I can guarantee that far too many people would just sign off and then violate the code, making the most honest folks seem the least honest)</p>
<p>* I’m struggling with the *ethics of blogging* issues myself.  Readership here is up about 400% during the conference.   Should I be extra nice to Plantronics because they gave me great lounges, work areas, lunches, and some gadgetry?    Monster because they threw two great parties and were very nice about inviting me  &#8211; three if you count the “after party”.   SONY for the great bash at Hard Rock last night?</p>
<p>As I’ve pointed out many times before the line between pay to post and the nuanced “lobbyist” effects is impossible to draw clearly.   I like *real journalist* <a title="Kara Swisher" href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/">Kara Swisher</a>’s superb disclosure policy, though disclosing a lot more than most of her fellow big time journalists would do.    There was a prominent tech reporter at the SONY party last night and I’m hoping to get some comments from him via email about how he treats the CES giveaways.</p>
<p>Ultimately I think you need to trust the person you read to keep it legitimate, but bloggers, and certainly journalists, probably should go further as Kara has and really lay things out on the line.   You cannot eliminate bias in reporting &#8211; but you can … report it.</p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/joeduck.wordpress.com/1457/" border="0" alt="" /> <img src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/joeduck.wordpress.com/1457/" border="0" alt="" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/joeduck.wordpress.com/1457/"><img src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/joeduck.wordpress.com/1457/" border="0" alt="" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/joeduck.wordpress.com/1457/"><img src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/joeduck.wordpress.com/1457/" border="0" alt="" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/joeduck.wordpress.com/1457/"><img src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/joeduck.wordpress.com/1457/" border="0" alt="" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/joeduck.wordpress.com/1457/"><img src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/joeduck.wordpress.com/1457/" border="0" alt="" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/joeduck.wordpress.com/1457/"><img src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/joeduck.wordpress.com/1457/" border="0" alt="" /></a> <img src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=joeduck.com&amp;blog=119943&amp;post=1457&amp;subd=joeduck&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" border="0" alt="" /></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technology-report.com/2008/01/ces-2008-blogging-officially-arrives-at-ces-with-some-mixed-reactions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AppleGate</title>
		<link>http://technology-report.com/2007/05/applegate/</link>
		<comments>http://technology-report.com/2007/05/applegate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 04:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hunkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/applegate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here in Southern Oregon, Applegate is the charming valley and river that was named after early settlers. For Silicon Valley the new term &#8220;AppleGate&#8221; refers to the top tech blog Engadget&#8217;s posting of a fake email suggesting that Apple&#8217;s iPhone would be delayed. The report led to an almost immediate sell off of Apple stock [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in Southern Oregon, Applegate is the charming valley and river that was named after early settlers.    For Silicon Valley the new term &#8220;AppleGate&#8221; refers to the top tech blog Engadget&#8217;s posting of a fake email  suggesting that Apple&#8217;s iPhone would be delayed.  The report  led to an almost immediate sell off of Apple stock and a 4 billion dollar decline in Apple&#8217;s market capitalization, though the stock rebounded quickly when it became clear the email was a fake.</p>
<p>This appears to be a *superb* example of how information is reflected by the stock market and how quickly.   I get the idea the (bogus) iPhone delay rumor affected the price of APPL almost immediately but have not checked the timing.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/" title="Tech Crunchiness">Mike at TechCrunch</a> has a nice play by play and graph of AppleGate, and the Engadget post AppleGate post is <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/" title="AppleGate">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technology-report.com/2007/05/applegate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter and SEO</title>
		<link>http://technology-report.com/2007/05/twitter-and-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://technology-report.com/2007/05/twitter-and-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 16:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hunkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.wordpress.com/2007/05/10/twitter-and-seo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting.   My Chico the Wonder Dog SEO experiment is yielding some unexpected results.    A tweet about this is now higher in the ranks than the original blog post page. Chico the Wonder Dog has been trading places with another Chico the Wonder Dog.   That post is much older and may have more incoming links [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.   My Chico the Wonder Dog SEO experiment is yielding some unexpected results.    A tweet about this is now higher in the ranks than the original blog post page.</p>
<p><a href="http://joeduck.wordpress.com/2006/12/01/chico-the-wonder-dog/" title="Chico the Wonder Dog">Chico the Wonder Dog</a> has been trading places with another <a href="http://atimeandaplace.blogspot.com/2005/12/chico-wonder-dog.html" title="Chicohuahua the Wonder Dog">Chico the Wonder Dog</a>.   That post is much older and may have more incoming links since that guy seems to spend more time posting about his dog than I do, though based on my quick analysis of this and a few other cases I think it indicates that Google looks carefully at the rate of link growth, and if it slows they tend to put back the &#8220;old, tried and true&#8221; page in favor of the newcomer. This makes sense from an anti-spam perspective although in Chicos particular case it probably does not yield the <a href="http://joeduck.wordpress.com/2006/12/01/chico-the-wonder-dog/" title="Chico the Wonder Dog">top dog.</a></p>
<p>However, the Twitter reference rising to high seems really surprising because Twitter posts are generally small and insignificant (as it is here).  I&#8217;m surprised Google ranks these at all, let alone makes them competitive with meaty postings.  Perhaps Google has elevated &#8220;social media&#8221; in some algorithmic fashion though my guess is this is a defect that will be corrected &#8211; ie Twitter is structured in a way that links to these posts from many Twitter people and this is messing up the Algo&#8217;s handing of this insignificant material.    If I&#8217;m searching for &#8220;Tesla Coil&#8221;, let along pretty much anything of any relevance, I hardly want a bunch of Twitter posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technology-report.com/2007/05/twitter-and-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Startup Camp</title>
		<link>http://technology-report.com/2006/11/startup-camp/</link>
		<comments>http://technology-report.com/2006/11/startup-camp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hunkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mashups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.wordpress.com/2006/11/02/startup-camp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m back at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View at Startup Camp, another great UNconference event from David Berlind and Doug Gold and hosted by several nice sponsor companies. The focus here is broader than the Mashup Camps which were more relevant to my travel experience and where we need to go with Online [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m back at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View at <a href="http://startupcamp.com" title="Startup Camp">Startup Camp</a>, another great UNconference event from David Berlind and Doug Gold and hosted by several nice sponsor companies.</p>
<p>The focus here is broader than the <a href="http://www.mashupcamp.com" title="Mashup Camp">Mashup Camps</a> which were more relevant to my travel experience and where we need to go with <a href="http://www.ohwy.com" title="Online Highways">Online Highways</a>, but I&#8217;ve enjoyed excellent &#8220;open&#8221; presentations by<a href="http://www.syndic8.com/weblog/" title="Jeff Barr"> Jeff Barr</a> from Amazon and Venture Capitalists <a href="http://blog.softtechvc.com/" title="Jeff Clavier">Jeff Clavier</a> with <a href="http://ricksegal.typepad.com/" title="Rick Segal">Rick Segal</a> who are generously offering some really key insights into the startup funding process.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.photomatt.net" title="Matt Mullenweg">Matt Mullenweg</a> is here and it was fun to meet the creator of the superb WordPress environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technology-report.com/2006/11/startup-camp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

