<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technology Report &#187; mobile entertainment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technology-report.com/tag/mobile-entertainment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technology-report.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 02:40:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why my iPOD 3G nano STILL rules</title>
		<link>http://technology-report.com/2009/01/why-my-ipod-3g-nano-still-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://technology-report.com/2009/01/why-my-ipod-3g-nano-still-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TechGhy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3G Ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G Ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ipod comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ipod problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology-report.com/?p=1132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By John Ghysels, technology-report.com
Apple&#8217;s surprisingly high profits not withstanding, there appears to be trouble about in iPOD land, if comments over at Amazon.com, like this one, are to be believed:  http://www.amazon.com/review/R1J5U3Y9O8E1YF/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm. 
Indeed, a brief web surf showed a surprising degree of frustration with the new 4G iPOD nano. The main complaints seem to center on compatibility issues. This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1133" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 170px"><a href="http://technology-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ipod-3g-nano.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1133" title="ipod-3g-nano" src="http://technology-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ipod-3g-nano.jpg" alt="My IPOD can beat up your IPOD" width="160" height="160" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">My iPOD can beat up your iPOD</p></div>
<p><strong>By John Ghysels, <em>technology-report.com</em></strong></p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s surprisingly high profits not withstanding, there appears to be trouble about in iPOD land, if comments over at Amazon.com, like this one, are to be believed:  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/review/R1J5U3Y9O8E1YF/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm">http://www.amazon.com/review/R1J5U3Y9O8E1YF/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm</a>. </p>
<p>Indeed, a brief web surf showed a surprising degree of frustration with the new 4G iPOD nano. The main complaints seem to center on compatibility issues. This is perhaps because the new 4G nano is compatible with, well, just about nothing. If one has invested big bucks in earlier iPOD compatible cases, holders, speakers or chargers, as well as the much more expensive consoles, monitors, audio players, etc., then you basically have to start over. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s always hard to judge from any rating site what exactly is going on with many gadget products. You never know how many ratings are just hot-heads venting about confusing technology. If you believed even half of all this on-line ranting, we&#8217;re certain you would NEVER even buy a cell phone. </p>
<p>However, the proof is in the pudding, or in this case, in the mysterious workings of the marketplace.  <strong>Technology-Report </strong>notes that prices on &#8220;new&#8221; 3G iPOD models are still suprisingly high and, in fact, are about equal to the price for the new 4G POD Nano, at about $140.  This is in spite of the many added features on the new generation iPOD. </p>
<p>While production on the 3G has likely stopped and supply issues certainly come into play here, it is still a bit shocking that an earlier generation is selling for around the price of the new, &#8220;much improved&#8221; version.  Even the prices of older 4 Gig, 3G iPOD&#8217;s are holding their values, with heavily used units still selling for $80 or more. That&#8217;s better than most houses in California. </p>
<p>The marketplace may be reflecting the impact of an expensive upgrade, as well as the satisfaction of existing users. Apple may have violated the old cardinal rule of Detroit, planned obsolesence, and done themselves too well on the &#8220;old&#8221; 3G nano.  </p>
<p>In any case, I love my 3G iPOD nano. It still has the feel of hi-tech and runs like a top, even two years later. I still while away oodles of time, carefully craming loads of videos and audio entertainment into it&#8217;s measely 4 gigs. It&#8217;s small size and ease of use has allowed it to infiltrate into my life and that of many others. </p>
<p>Yep. I love my iPOD 3G nano.  And I ain&#8217;t givin&#8217; it up jest yet.   </p>
<p>&#8211;John Ghysels, 01/22/09</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technology-report.com/2009/01/why-my-ipod-3g-nano-still-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
